Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2018-10
  • 2018-11
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-07
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • 2024-04
  • 2024-05
  • Recent studies indicate that the canonical

    2018-10-20

    Recent studies indicate that the canonical Wnt pathway affects BMSC osteogenic differentiation. Wnt signaling can promote osteoblastic precursor differentiation into more differentiated osteoblasts and can serve as a negative regulator of adipogenesis (Glass et al., 2005; Krishnan et al., 2006). This differentiation process is tightly regulated by complex signaling events (Luu et al., 2007). β-Catenin is indeed a key signaling molecule that promotes cell differentiation. Our results showed that Ex-4 dramatically promoted β-catenin nuclear translocation and TCF7L2 expression in BMSCs. These effects were significantly inhibited by the block or knockdown of GLP-1R, suggesting that GLP-1R was involved in crosstalk with the β-catenin signaling pathway. GLP-1R is localized in multiple tissues and cell types (Holst, 2007). GLP-1 agonist binding to GLP-1R activates various different pathways involved in the proliferation, differentiation, and protection from apoptosis. On the basis of our present results we concluded that PKA, a GLP-1R downstream Myriocin Supplier exerting a strong bond to β-catenin and PI3K and induced by Ex-4, played a dual role in its interaction with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. First, at the molecular level, PKA phosphorylated β-catenin at its Ser675 and promoted β-catenin nuclear translocation, and subsequently recruited LEF/TCF DNA binding factors to initiate the expression of osteoblast differentiation-related gene, driving BMSC differentiation into osteoblasts. It has also Myriocin Supplier been reported that PKA phosphorylates β-catenin at two sites, Ser552 and Ser675, thus preventing its ubiquitination and thereby stabilizing β-catenin (Hino et al., 2005; Taurin et al., 2006). Second, PKA also phosphorylated PI3K, which in turn phosphorylated AKT, leading to GSK3β phosphorylation. GSK3β is a key enzyme that negatively regulates the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and canonical Wnt signaling activation also requires the inhibition of GSK3β activity (Clevers and Nusse, 2012). The PKA signaling pathway can crosstalk with the PI3K/AKT pathway in endothelial cells (Namkoong et al., 2009), and the PI3K/AKT pathway can communicate with the GSK3β/β-catenin pathway in epithelial cells (Son et al., 2012). Phosphorylated GSK3β dephosphorylates β-catenin and prevents its degradation in the ubiquitin-dependent proteosome pathway. This event also helps to promote β-catenin translocation into the nucleus, leading to BMSC osteoblast differentiation. In summary, our results indicated that BMSC GLP-1R plays a crucial role in the regulation of osteoblast differentiation by interacting with the PKA/β-catenin and PKA/PI3K/AKT/GSK3β/β-catenin signaling pathways, both representing critical events in Ex-4-induced anabolic bone formation (Figure 7).
    Experimental Procedures
    Author Contributions
    Introduction Cancer cells often exhibit similar properties to somatic stem/progenitor cells of the tissue of origin (Reya et al., 2001; Rossi and Weissman, 2006). Considering that progenitor cells at the developmental stage and somatic stem/progenitor cells in some adult tissues have the ability for self-renewal and/or active proliferation, it has been proposed that maintenance of the stem/progenitor cell state could be a driving force for tumor development (Reya et al., 2001). Osteosarcoma is a representative cancer that exhibits shared features with normal stem/progenitor cells (Luo et al., 2008; Thomas et al., 2004). The late markers of osteogenic differentiation are silenced while the early markers are modestly expressed in osteosarcomas (Luo et al., 2008; Thomas et al., 2004). Moreover, more aggressive phenotypes of osteosarcomas are correlated with features of early osteogenic progenitors (He et al., 2010; Luo et al., 2008), suggesting that defects in the osteogenic differentiation program may play a role in osteosarcoma development and progression. However, the causative aberrations that confer stem/progenitor cell properties on osteosarcoma cells are not fully understood.